I found there to be enough new enemy types and plants to encourage new tactics. The game is very similar to the original, particularly the first world, but the second and third worlds I felt were interesting in the way they mixed up the playing field. I don’t agree with what your friends are telling you. According to reviews and documents Kotaku received from PopCap, the Chinese version of the game is too “hard”. So what happened in the three years since the first PvZ? According to reviews and online comments in China the difference is in Popcap’s monetization model for the game. In contrary, PvZ2, despite being free, currently holds a two star rating with the majority of reviewers giving the game one star. That’s not taking into account the ratings it received on the multitude of Android app stores in China. Costing about $US3 for the full game in China, the original game currently holds a four and a half star rating on the Chinese version of the Apple app store. It wasn’t uncommon to see people playing PvZ on their iPhones or iPads on a daily commute. Popcap’s original PvZ was very well received in China.
Despite the “acclaim”, many of Popcap’s China fans are upset with the game, claiming they feel “gouged” by the games in-app purchasing. It currently holds an 89 per cent rating on Metacritic. Since it was released almost two weeks ago, Popcap’s latest Zombie versus vegetation tower defence game, Plants versus Zombies 2: It’s About Time has received pretty decent reviews.
0 kommentar(er)
